Mine safety should focus on prevention
John Florez
This demonstrates the disconnect between the public's outcry to prevent another disaster and how the Legislature responded. The state quickly put together the Utah Mine Safety Commission to recommend ways to improve mine safety and determine if the state should play a role in doing so; however, that idea was quickly squelched by a commission member and senator from a mining district who said there was no need for state involvement the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration was sufficient.
The commission made more than 30 recommendations, primarily focusing on responding to disasters, including a toothless Utah Office of Coal Mine Safety in the Utah Industrial Commission. And, without much debate, the Legislature adopted many of the recommendations.
Now, we know differently. Last week Richard Stickler, MSHA's director, released a Department of Labor report finding fault with MSHA's ability to adequately inspect and approve mine safety plans that had there been more scrutiny of the safety plans and awareness of earlier safety problems that went unreported, perhaps the disaster could have been prevented. Early in the disaster, mine inspectors noted that two sets of eyes looking at the problem would help. And that is part of the answer. Though there are several agencies responsible for overseeing mines MSHA; Bureau of Land Management; Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining they fail to effectively talk to one another. Everyone and no one is responsible to make sure mines are safe. There is no one who can connect the dots, nor anyone who can be held accountable.
Following are some specific policies the state should consider adopting:
Recent comments
We have heard the opinions of state and national leaders;we have…
mining family | Aug. 4, 2008 at 2:57 p.m.


