Bear mauling wasn't Utah's fault, state official says
He says boy's parents and feds are to blame
"It's not the state's fault," assistant Utah attorney general Reed Stringham told the Deseret News. "I hope that's the message that's been conveyed throughout this. It's a tragedy, but that doesn't mean the state is responsible."
Samuel Ives was camping with his mother, Rebecca Ives, stepfather, Tim Mulvey, and stepbrother, Jack Mulvey, in American Fork Canyon last Father's Day weekend when a black bear ripped a hole in their tent and dragged him out, fatally mauling him.
Rebecca Ives and Samuel's natural father, Kevan Francis, filed lawsuits in 4th District Court and U.S. District Court in March, arguing that the state and federal governments failed to warn campers that a bear had harassed campers in the same area a day before. Had they known that, they never would have camped there and their son would still be alive, they say.
The state recently filed a response to the complaint in 4th District Court, stating that because of the Utah Governmental Immunity Act, the state is protected against this prosecution.
Allen K. Young, who represents the parties, said they are upset by this passing of the blame.
"The fact of the matter is, we're outraged," Young said. "First of all, it's my belief that probably 90 percent of people probably wouldn't realize that you ought to put your coolers away if you're camping in a national forest. These people had put away their coolers. The state throws everything at the wall and hopes something will stick."
The Ives/Mulvey family has been up the canyon dozens, if not hundreds, of times, and said they consider themselves experienced campers. They know they must put their food away at night.
"If there wasn't an attack the night before, we wouldn't be here arguing it," Francis said at a press conference in March. "We know bears exist, but if there's a shark attack at a beach, they close the beach."
Young also disagrees with the state's defense that the bear was a "natural condition on publicly owned or controlled lands" — a factor that would allow governmental immunity.
"It's our position that they have policies and procedures dealing with bears," Young said. "Once they're advised (the bear is) a nuisance and a problem, then they have duties. It's different if it had randomly come into the camp that night."
Recent comments
My parents had camped in that area just a couple of nights before...
There were signs posted | May 13, 2008 at 10:36 a.m.
This is like suing Toyota , because a child was carjacked and later...
jason | May 12, 2008 at 5:26 p.m.
Stay away from the Wild animals home and they will stay away from...
Denice | May 10, 2008 at 12:07 a.m.
